This chapter explores Abstraction as the cognitive leap that set humanity apart, weaving mental representations from the threads of evolution’s tapestry. Rooted in the expansion of the frontal cortex, abstraction transformed survival instincts into symbols, stories, and systems, birthing the Metaverse pillars—Capital, Information, Innovation, Trust. Drawing on biology’s ancient engines, it traces how low-level abstractions in early mammals scaled to humanity’s boundless creativity, now poised to shape technological and cosmic futures. Abstraction is not just thought’s crown; it is the universe’s mirror, reflecting life’s drive to transcend.
In the grand arc of the Cosmological Century, where Chemistry forged life’s molecules in Year 10 and Evolution spun complexity through Year 11, Abstraction emerges as humanity’s defining spark (Alberts et al., 2014; Knoll, 2003). From the primal seas where RNA whispered replication to the Cambrian’s kaleidoscope of forms, life honed variation, selection, and collaboration (Cech et al., 1981; Marshall, 2006). Yet it was in the crucible of mammalian brains, refined through extinction’s fires, that a new force flickered: the ability to hold mental images beyond the immediate, to weave low-level abstractions like spatial maps or social cues (Springer et al., 2013). For humans, this spark—ignited by the frontal cortex’s growth—diverged us from our primate kin, scaling simple memory to symbols, languages, and systems that echo the universe’s complexity (Herculano-Houzel, 2009; Smil, 2017).
Abstraction is the mind’s alchemy, turning sensory chaos into patterns—mental models of paths, myths of stars, or ledgers of value. It began as a whisper in early mammals, like Purgatorius navigating post-Cretaceous nights (~65 million years ago), and roared into a symphony with Homo sapiens (~300,000 years ago), whose neocortex wove timekeeping, language, and art (Springer et al., 2013; Harmand et al., 2015). This chapter traces that divergence, rooting it in low-level cognitive leaps, and explores how abstraction’s fire now fuels the Metaverse pillars, urging us to craft a Living Civilization that collaborates across stars (Nowak, 2006).
Abstraction’s roots lie in the neural scaffolding of early mammals, forged in the shadow of the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction (~66 million years ago). Small, nocturnal survivors like Purgatorius scurried through a shattered world, their modest brains honing sensory processing to evade predators and forage in darkness (Springer et al., 2013). These creatures, no larger than rats, relied on the hippocampus to form cognitive maps, mental representations of space that transcended immediate sensory input (O’Keefe & Nadel, 1978). Like a rat recalling a maze’s twists today, Purgatorius encoded paths to food or shelter, a low-level abstraction integrating visual landmarks and movement cues into a persistent model (Tolman, 1948; Alberts et al., 2014).
This capacity was revolutionary. Unlike reptiles, whose reactive brains tethered them to the present, early mammals abstracted the past into memory, projecting it forward to anticipate outcomes. The hippocampus wove sensory threads—sight, smell, motion—into spatial and episodic memories, a foundation for planning (Herculano-Houzel, 2009). Studies on modern rats, navigating mazes like the Morris water maze, reveal this low-level abstraction: they infer shortcuts and adapt to changes, suggesting flexible mental models akin to those of early mammals (O’Keefe & Nadel, 1978). This was Evolution’s first cognitive spark, a divergence from instinct’s rigid grip, setting the stage for primates’ ascent (Wilson, 1975).
Three familiar processes—variation, selection, collaboration—drove this cognitive dawn, now layered with neural complexity. Variation sparked through mutations, crafting proteins for synaptic growth, as seen in early mammals’ sensory refinements post-Cretaceous (Alberts et al., 2014). Random tweaks in genes like FOXP2, later tied to vocal control, hinted at neural flexibility, enabling richer mental models (Enard et al., 2007).
Selection sculpted survivors in predator-rich lands. Nocturnal mammals with sharper memory or faster learning—those who recalled safe paths or predator scents—outlived others, their traits spreading through populations. This directional pressure favored cognitive agility, a precursor to abstraction’s rise (Knoll, 2003; Grant & Grant, 2008).
Collaboration wove social bonds, amplifying cognition. Early mammals, like proto-primates, foraged in loose groups, sharing warnings or resources. These cooperative networks, mirroring Cambrian reefs, rewarded those who could interpret social cues or anticipate group needs, fostering neural growth (Nowak, 2006; Porter, 2016). Competition for mates or food honed quick thinking, while predation’s threat sharpened vigilance, a crucible for mental abstraction (Wilson, 1975).
Two truths anchored this cognitive leap. Common Ancestry ties all mammals to a shared neural blueprint, rooted in these early survivors. The hippocampus, wiring spatial and episodic memory, threads through rats, primates, and humans, its circuits a universal scaffold for low-level abstraction (Herculano-Houzel, 2009; Alberts et al., 2014). Shared genes, like those for synaptic plasticity, underscore this continuity, a legacy of Year 11’s mammalian dawn (Springer et al., 2013).
Descent with Modification drove cognitive divergence. Mutations layered new neural pathways, selection favored those enhancing survival, and collaboration enriched social cognition. From Purgatorius’ spatial maps to primates’ social reasoning, each step built on the last, like a cosmic artist refining mental sketches (Darwin, 1859; Knoll, 2003).
Fossils trace this neural arc. Purgatorius (~65 million years ago) skulls show enlarged olfactory and visual regions, hinting at sensory-driven memory (Springer et al., 2013). Modern studies, like O’Keefe and Nadel’s 1978 work on rat hippocampal “place cells,” reveal how neurons encode spatial maps, echoing early mammalian cognition (O’Keefe & Nadel, 1978). Tolman’s 1948 latent learning experiments, where rats navigated mazes without immediate rewards, confirmed flexible mental models, a low-level abstraction (Tolman, 1948).
John O’Keefe unveiled the hippocampus’s role in spatial memory, earning a 2014 Nobel Prize. Edward Tolman framed cognitive maps as mental abstractions. E.O. Wilson linked social evolution to cognitive growth, emphasizing collaboration. Richard Dawkins’ memes extended cognitive evolution to culture, a bridge to human abstraction (O’Keefe & Nadel, 1978; Tolman, 1948; Wilson, 1975; Dawkins, 1976).
Key Scientists:
By ~60 million years ago, primates like Plesiadapis swung through Year 11’s treetops, their arboreal crucible forging cognitive leaps (Springer et al., 2013). Unlike other mammals, primates faced complex habitats—branching mazes demanding spatial memory—and social groups requiring nuanced cooperation. These pressures drove the frontal cortex’s expansion, a neural hub for planning, decision-making, and social reasoning, layering higher-order abstractions atop mammalian memory (Herculano-Houzel, 2009). Where Purgatorius mapped paths, primates like Proconsul (~23 million years ago) anticipated social dynamics, their frontal lobes weaving mental models of allies, rivals, and outcomes (Wilson, 1975).
This divergence wasn’t merely neural scale. Primates’ stereoscopic vision and grasping hands, honed for tree life, enriched sensory inputs, feeding the frontal cortex’s growth. Social complexity—grooming, alliances, deception—demanded abstract reasoning: remembering past favors or predicting betrayals. Tests on modern primates, like chimpanzees categorizing tools or capuchins trading tokens, reveal low-level abstraction, generalizing from experience to solve novel tasks (Tomasello & Call, 1997). These echo the cognitive scaffolding that set primates apart, a foundation for hominins’ symbolic leap (Carroll, 2005).
Variation sparked neural innovations, with mutations enhancing frontal cortex connectivity, as seen in FOXP2 variants for communication (Enard et al., 2007). Selection favored primates with sharper social or spatial reasoning, their survival tied to navigating treetop rivalries or predator threats (Knoll, 2003). Collaboration amplified cognition, as cooperative troops shared food or defended kin, rewarding those who could abstract group dynamics, a precursor to Trust (Nowak, 2006). Competition for mates honed cunning, while predation’s pressure sharpened foresight, mental models projecting escape routes or alliances (Porter, 2016).
Neural Plasticity, a primate hallmark, allowed brains to rewire through experience, strengthening pathways for abstraction. The frontal cortex, with its dense synapses, enabled flexible reasoning, a leap from rigid instincts (Herculano-Houzel, 2009). Social Cognition emerged as a driver, with primates abstracting social hierarchies or intentions, a low-level precursor to human symbols like language or value (Wilson, 1975; Tomasello & Call, 1997).
The frontal cortex’s rise birthed primate hallmarks: tool use (Proconsul’s stick probes), social learning (teaching kin), and proto-abstraction (mental models of group roles). By ~7 million years ago, hominins like Sahelanthropus inherited this scaffold, their larger frontal lobes poised for symbolic thought (Harmand et al., 2015). Modern tests—chimpanzees solving puzzles or parrots associating words—confirm primates’ low-level abstraction, a bridge to human complexity (Tomasello & Call, 1997).
Fossils like Proconsul (~23 million years ago) show enlarged frontal regions, hinting at social cognition (Springer et al., 2013). Genetic studies, like FOXP2’s role in ape vocalization, tie neural growth to abstraction (Enard et al., 2007). Cognitive tests, like Savage-Rumbaugh’s work with bonobos using lexigrams, reveal symbolic processing (Savage-Rumbaugh et al., 1993). Michael Tomasello’s primate studies emphasize social abstraction, while Suzana Herculano-Houzel’s neuron counts quantify human divergence (Tomasello & Call, 1997; Herculano-Houzel, 2009).
Key Scientists:
With Homo sapiens (~300,000 years ago), abstraction soared, the frontal cortex—housing ~86 billion neurons and 100 trillion synapses—unleashing a neocortex capable of recursive thought (Herculano-Houzel, 2009). Unlike primates, sapiens wove symbols, transforming sensory chaos into shared systems that transcended survival. Timekeeping abstracted natural rhythms into calendars, language encoded thoughts into words, and art distilled experiences into evocative forms (Aubert et al., 2014; Harmand et al., 2015). These abstractions, rooted in low-level memory and social reasoning, scaled to cultural memes—ideas spreading faster than genes—birthing the Metaverse pillars: Capital (value systems), Information (knowledge), Innovation (creativity), Trust (cooperation) (Dawkins, 1976; Smil, 2017).
The ability to perceive abstractions allowed humanity to move beyond instincts, securing physical needs like food and shelter, and delve into realms of meaning—contemplating our place in the Universe. Timekeeping, language, and art, evident in the archaeological record, were pivotal in this leap, each a cornerstone of the Metaverse pillars that define our Living Civilization.
Timekeeping, one of humanity’s earliest abstractions, imposed order on the relentless flow of time, transforming natural rhythms into measurable systems. Early humans, like other primates, tracked time instinctively—gauging daylight for safety or sensing seasonal shifts. As cognition evolved with Homo sapiens (~300,000 years ago), our ancestors developed sophisticated methods to mark and predict time, driven by survival, navigation, and ritual needs (Herculano-Houzel, 2009).
Significance: Timekeeping abstracted natural cycles into units—days, months, years—enabling planning for migrations, agriculture, and rituals. As Information, it encoded environmental knowledge; as Trust, it coordinated communities; as Innovation, it spurred tools like notched bones; and as Capital, it invested effort in structures like Stonehenge. This abstraction laid the foundation for calendars, fostering societal cohesion (Ruggles, 1999; Dawkins, 1976).
Language, a profound abstraction, transformed fleeting thoughts into shared symbols, enabling humans to encode complex ideas and coordinate societies. A child’s first word, like “Mama,” reflects the cognitive leap of associating sounds with meaning, a capacity rooted in sapiens’ neural evolution (Herculano-Houzel, 2009).
Significance: Language abstracted sensory input into arbitrary symbols, enabling temporal planning (“tomorrow’s hunt”), cultural preservation, and social norms. As Information, it stored knowledge; as Trust, it scaled cooperation; as Innovation, it spurred new ideas; and as Capital, it created value through trade networks. Language was the backbone of cultural evolution, outpacing genetic change (Dawkins, 1976; Fitch, 2010).
Art, a profound abstraction, transformed emotions, experiences, and ideas into forms that transcended the moment, fostering community and creativity. Emerging alongside language and timekeeping, art reflected sapiens’ symbolic cognition (~300,000 years ago) (Herculano-Houzel, 2009).
Significance: Art distilled the intangible—fear, hope, identity—into shared symbols, fostering cultural transmission. As Information, it preserved narratives; as Innovation, it pushed creative boundaries; as Trust, it united communities through rituals; and as Capital, it held value in traded beads. Art’s abstraction mirrored language’s symbols and timekeeping’s cycles, weaving a shared reality (Aujoulat, 2005; Dawkins, 1976).
Variation drove neural and cultural leaps, with mutations like FOXP2 enabling language and memes crafting art or timekeeping tools (Enard et al., 2007). Selection favored symbolic thinkers, whose paintings, words, or calendars outcompeted rivals, spreading genes and ideas (Grant & Grant, 2008). Collaboration built societies, as tribes shared stories, rituals, or seasonal plans, weaving Trust, while competition for status honed Innovation (Nowak, 2006). Cultural Evolution, outpacing biology, spread memes like art or writing, abstractions that reshaped reality (Dawkins, 1976).
Symbolic Thought defined sapiens, abstracting sensory data into timekeeping units, words, or images, enabling complex systems like trade or governance (Fitch, 2010). Cultural Transmission scaled abstraction, memes like calendars or myths persisting across generations, a cultural echo of genetic descent (Dawkins, 1976).
Timekeeping, language, and art birthed the Metaverse pillars. Capital emerged as value abstraction, from traded beads to currencies. Information abstracted knowledge, from cave paintings to oral traditions. Innovation wove tools and ideas, from notched bones to symbolic art. Trust abstracted cooperation, from ritual gatherings to tribal alliances. These abstractions, evident in cave art (~40,000 years ago), trade networks (~10,000 BCE), and early writing (~3,000 BCE), mirror the universe’s complexity, scaling human thought to civilization (Aubert et al., 2014; Smil, 2017).
Archaeological records—Ishango Bone, Lascaux paintings, Blombos engravings—trace symbolic leaps (Marshack, 1972; Aubert et al., 2014; Henshilwood et al., 2002). Genetic studies, like FOXP2’s role in language, confirm neural roots (Enard et al., 2007). Neural imaging maps the neocortex’s recursive circuits (Herculano-Houzel, 2009). Noam Chomsky framed language as abstraction’s core, Alexander Marshack decoded timekeeping artifacts, and Clive Ruggles illuminated megalithic calendars (Chomsky, 1965; Marshack, 1972; Ruggles, 1999).
Key Scientists:
Abstraction’s arc now stretches beyond biology, weaving technological and cosmic dreams. Neural networks, mimicking human cognition, process patterns to form representations, a nod to the hippocampus’s ancient maps (LeCun et al., 2015). These Digital Intelligence systems, learning and adapting along with their programmers, amplify existing human creativity, raising questions of their role—partners or tools?—in our future (LeCun et al., 2015). Their development, rooted in human ingenuity, must prioritize collaboration to foster shared progress, echoing life’s cooperative webs (Nowak, 2006).
Cosmically, abstraction fuels humanity’s starward gaze. Gene-editing technologies could craft organisms for extraterrestrial survival while digital neural networks design habitats. Future economic systems may need to verify interplanetary or even interstellar exchanges, abstractions scaling life’s expanding web to exoplanets and star systems (Doudna & Sternberg, 2017; LeCun et al., 2015). Seeding microbes to distant worlds or terraforming them extends Evolution’s reach, a cooperative act rooted in Year 10’s molecular dance (Crick, 1981; McKay et al., 1991).
Variation sparks algorithms and genetic edits, crafting endless new forms. Selection favors systems—biological or technological—that thrive in cosmic climates. Collaboration binds humanity and technology together, weaving Trust across stars, while competition drives Innovation (Nowak, 2006). Cultural Evolution spreads memes like sustainable systems, replacing scarcity with abundance (Dawkins, 1976).
Abstraction’s future could be a merger of biology, culture, and technology. Gene-editing crafts resilient settlers for a multitude of worlds and environments, echoing the Cambrian diversity explosion (Doudna & Sternberg, 2017; Carroll, 2005). Neural networks amplify Innovation, while a focus on sustainable systems sustains ecosystems, a nod to the Pre-Cambrian webs that built our own (LeCun et al., 2015). This arc, from Purgatorius’ maps to star-bound societies, plants abstractions that bloom in technological and galactic realms, a Living Civilization long past the Great Filter (Smil, 2017).
Gene-editing trials and neural networks herald this future (Doudna & Sternberg, 2017; LeCun et al., 2015). Astrobiology’s seeding proposals test cosmic expansion (Crick, 1981). Jennifer Doudna’s gene-editing, Yann LeCun’s neural networks, and Francis Crick’s cosmic vision light the path, weaving abstractions for a galactic stage (Doudna & Sternberg, 2017; LeCun et al., 2015; Crick, 1981).
Key Scientists:
Abstraction, from Purgatorius’ spatial maps to sapiens’ timekeeping, language, and art, is humanity’s divergence, a spark that wove the Metaverse pillars from life’s ancient engines. It challenges us to shift from competition’s scarcity to collaboration’s abundance, a choice echoing Evolution’s cooperative webs (Nowak, 2006). As we craft technologies and seed stars, abstraction’s fire—rooted in the frontal cortex’s growth—urges us to transcend the Great Filter, building a civilization where Capital measures sustainability, Information verifies openly, Innovation thrives collectively, and Trust unites all life (Smil, 2017; Nowak, 2006). This is Evolution’s call: to weave abstractions that mirror the universe, a cosmic symphony of boundless possibility.
Abstractions are humanity’s tools to distill the Universe’s complexity—its Matter, Energy, Physics, and Chemistry—into systems of meaning that shape civilization. In the Metaverse, the abstract realm of human thought, these distillations manifest as Capital (systems of value), Information (systems of knowledge), Innovation (systems of creativity), and Trust (systems of coordination). Abstractions simplify reality by focusing on patterns, enabling humans to move beyond the tangible—a rock’s weight—to the conceptual—a coin’s worth. They bridge the physical, from Year 10’s molecular soups, to the abstract, like Year 11’s economies and laws (Alberts et al., 2014; Smil, 2017). Early abstractions, such as timekeeping, language, and art, laid the foundation for these pillars, transforming survival instincts into cultural systems that guide humanity’s path toward collaboration or control, abundance or scarcity.
Let us now dive deeper into this world above the world, and put some definitions onto the realm of the Metaverse.